[1. Opening Items/Roll Call] [00:00:06] >> 22,020 LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL BOARD STUDY SESSION. LET THE RECORD REFLECT ALL BOARD MEMBERS ARE PRESENT. MARK STEWART IS PARTICIPATING EMOTELY. THIS MEETING ALONG WITH ALL MEETINGS IS BEING HELD IN PERSON HOWEVER ATTENDEES MUCH PRE-REGISTER TO ATTEND A BOARD MEETING, STUDY SESSION OR SPECIAL BOARD MEETING. DUE TO LIMITED SEATING CAPACITY REGISTRATION ARE FIRST-COME FIRST-SERVED BASIS. AN ACCEPTED UNTIL 1 PM FOR THE DAY THE MEETING. YOU CAN SEND THE MEETING AT T JENKINS AT LW ST.ORG AND SHE WILL CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE BUT ALL ATTENDEES ARE REQUIRED TO WEAR A FACE MASK AND MAINTAIN 6 FEET OF PHYSICAL DISTANCE AT ALL TIMES. UPON ARRIVING AT THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC WILL BE REQUIRED TO CHECK IN AT THE STATION PROCESS. BOARD MEETING STUDY SESSIONS OF SPECIAL NEEDS WILL BE VIEWABLE ON THE DISTRICT'S WEBSITE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO EXTRUDE THE MEANING YOU CAN CALL 425 à 936 Ã2813. ENTER CONFERENCE ID 37127 TO LISTEN TO THE MEETING. OKAY. BACK TO THE FIRST TOPIC OR WE WILL GO TO THE FIRST TOPIC OF [1. Bond and Levy Planning] TONIGHT AND THE ONLY TOPIC. WHICH IS BOND AND LEVY PLANNING. DOCTOR JOHN HOLMEN. >> BECAUSE WE REVIEWED SOME OF THIS ALREADY I WILL SHOW THE SLIDES BUT THEM SLIGHTLY SO FOR THOSE THAT ARE PARTICIPATING CAN HEAR. TONIGHT REALLY IS FOCUSED ON OUR BOND AND LEVY PLANNING. AS A DISTRICT WE KNOW THAT EVERY 4 YEARS THIS INACTIVITY WE CONSIDER. TONIGHT REALLY IS ABOUT THINKING ABOUT THESE LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY THAN WE HAVE THROUG THE POLICIES AND IDENTIFYING SOME OF THE VALUES THAT THE BOARD HOLDS IN TERMS OF OPERATIONAL EXPECTATIONS. KNOWING THAT WE THINK ABOUT ALL OF OUR POLICIES AND ALL OF OUR WORK IT REALLY IS DRIVING TOWARDS ALL RESULTS AND MISSION AND VISION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. HER ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY AND SKILL AND LIFE SKILLS CONSIDERATIONS SHIP. WE ALSO KNOW OUR COMMITMENT TO EQUITY IS EVERYTHING WE DO AS A DISTRICT. OUR COMMITMENT TO ENSURING ACADEMIC SUCCESS FOR ALL STUDENTS BY CLOSING GAPS WERE STUDENTS AND PROVIDED EQUITABLE INCLUSIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS FOR ALL STUDENTS AND STAFF AND COMMUNITIES. OUR THEORY BY COMMUNITY TO EQUITY WILL REMOVE PREDICTABILITY OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF THE CURRENTLY CORRELATES WITH RACE OR ANY OTHER SOCIAL AND CULTURAL FACTOR. TO INTERRUPT AT EQUITIES WERE GRADING CONCLUSIVE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENTS FOR ALL STUDENTS IS TO DISCOVER MAKE UNIQUE GIFTS AND TALENT AND INTERESTS EVERY CHILD POSSESSIONS. EVERY GO. IS THAT OKAY? SO MORE STUDY SESSION OUTCOMES 3 DISTINCT OUTCOMES OF THE BOARD MARKS AWAY FROM AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE MULTIPLE VARIABLES INTERACTING DECISIONS VARIABLE 20 2240 MEASURES. THAT THE BOARD UNDERSTANDS THE DATA ALL THAT IS BROUGHT TO YOU THIS EVENING AND OF THE BOARD HAS OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON THE OPTIONS AND WE WALK AWAY AND CONSIDER THE LEVY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO BRING BACK FINAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD. OKAY THERE YOU GO. OKAY, SO YOU'VE SEEN THE SLIDE A FEW DIFFERENT TIMES OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS. WE ARE SQUARELY IN JUNE HELD OUR SECOND MEETING WITH HER BOND ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING WITH THE BOARD THIS EVENING. THEN AUGUST THE IDEA WAS TO BRING BACK THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSIDERATION BASED ON ALL OF THAT FEEDBACK. SO WE MET THE BOARD IN JANUARY TO REALLY REVIEW THE LEVY TIMELINES, TALK ABOUT THE FACILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. TALKED ABOUT ENROLLMENT, CAPACITY AND ALL THOSE PIECES APPEARED IN APRIL WE BROUGHT ADDITIONAL WORK TO THE BOARD. THEN WE MET WITH BONDED LEVY [00:05:06] ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOTH IN MAY AND JUNE. IN OUR MEETING WE BRING TO THEM SOME LEVEL OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK AROUND THOSE OPTIONS. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE BONDED LEVY ADVISORY COMMITTEE WE REFRAME THE VALUES IN CONVERSATION AND THAT WE HAVE CONSIDERATIONS. NOT ONLY WERE FOR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES BUT FOR OUR COMMUNITY. WE THINK ABOUT THE VALUES, THE ALIGNMENT WITH OUR MISSION AND VISION. A VALUE FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND IN OUR SCHOOLS TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY EDUCATION FOR EACH AND EVERY STUDENT. WE NOTE THAT EXCELLENT SCHOOLS ARE CORE PART OF OUR COMMUNITY. WE ALSO HAVE A VALUE AND TRANSPARENCY IN OUR SCHOOL FUNDING. WHATEVER THE DECISIONS ARE WE WANT OUR COMMUNITY TO HAVE ACCESS TO KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THE DECISIONS AND THE UNDERLYING DATA BEHIND THOSE DECISIONS. AS A REMINDER, THERE ARE 4 DISTINCT TYPES OF FUNDING MEASURES THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED. ONE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS LEVY. AS YOU KNOW IT'S A LEVY THAT REALLY DOES FILL THE GAP BETWEEN STATE BASIC EDUCATION FUNDING AND REALLY THAT CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS THAT WE PROVIDE AS A DISTRICT. 2 TYPES OF CAPITAL LEVIES. REALLY IT'S A SINGLE TYPE BUT WE THINK ABOUT THEM THEY HAVE MULTIPLE PURPOSES. THE FIRST IS THE CAPITAL PROJECTS AND TECHNOLOGY AND FACILITY LEVY AS YOU KNOW WE RUN EVERY 4 YEARS ON THE SAME CYCLE AS OUR E PIANO TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE LION SHARE OF OUR TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM AND ANY SYSTEM UPGRADES. COMING WHEN HVAC NEEDS TO BE REPLACED OR OF ROOF NEEDS TO BE REPLACED THAT IS ON THE DISTRICT TO BE ABLE TO FUND THAT. THAT IS FUNDED THROUGH THE CAPITAL PROJECTS LEVY. AS WE THINK ABOUT OUR ONGOING NEED FOR STUDENT CAPACITY. THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT WAYS TO BE ABLE TO THINK ABOUT THAT. WE WILL TALK ABOUT THOSE PIECES TONIGHT. FIRST IS A CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION LEVY. WE RUN 2 DIFFERENT CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION LEVIES OVER THE LAST PERIOD OF TIME. THE FIRST AROUND 2011 AND AGAIN IN 2019 TO FUND DIFFERENT CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS. THEN AS YOU KNOW A BOND IS THAT REALLY LONG-TERM FUNDING STREAM. YOU GET THE MONEY UPFRONT AND PAID OFF OVER A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME. SO THIS SLIDE REALLY SHOWS WHERE WE ARE PRESENTLY AND THEN AS BONDS ARE PAID OFF WHAT HAPPENS WITH OUR OVERALL TAX RATE. THIS WILL BE A KEY FACTOR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE OPTIONS WE ARE BRINGING TO YOU TONIGHT. YOU CAN SEE HERE, RIGHT NOW WE ARE RIGHT AROUND $2.57 PER THOUSAND OF ASSESSED VALUE. OVER TIME YOU CAN SEE THE OVERALL CONSTRUCTION, THE BOND OF THE 60 LEVY PORTION OF THAT STARTS TO DECLINE. RIGHT NOW WE TARGETED A PRODUCT OR 15 FOR OVERALL CONSTRUCTION FUNDING PER THOUSAND OF ASSESSED VALUE. THAT DWINDLES OVER TIME SO WITH THAT WE BROUGHT TO YOU TONIGHT SOME DIFFERENT WAYS TO THINK ABOUT THE STRATEGY MOVING FORWARD BOTH FROM A SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM. SO WE WANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH SOME PERMIT INFORMATION ABOUT WAYS TO EVALUATE THE PROS AND CONS. SOME OF THE OVERALL CONSIDERATIONS THAT WE PUT TOGETHER THESE OPTIONS. ONE, THIS IS A DISTRICT THAT STRIVES FOR EXCELLENCE IN ACCOMPLISHING HIGH GOALS AND EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENT PROGRAMMING AND OUTCOMES. THE DISTRICT HAS ONGOING MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN CAPITAL FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT EXCELLENCE AND OUTCOMES FOR STUDENTS. AND LASTLY THE DISTRICT IS RAPIDLY GROWING, AND A DURABLE STUDENT CAPACITY PLANT REALLY IS REQUIRED. KNOWING THAT OUR NEED FOR ADDITIONAL SEATS FOR STUDENTS WILL CONTINUE TO GROW OVER TIME. WE ALSO KNOW WE HAVE 80 FACILITIES DON'T CURRENTLY MEET OUR EDUCATION SPECIFICATION. ALL OF THAT COMES INTO PLAY WHEN WE THINK ABOUT LONG-TERM STRATEGY THAT IS DURABLE OVER TIME. THAT CAN BE FUNDED OVER TIME. AND THAT MAKES SENSE. SO, EARLY IN THE PRESENTATION I [00:10:03] WANT TO GIVE YOU SOME INFORMATION SO AS YOU GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION YOU'RE NOT WONDERING ABOUT SOME OF THESE PIECES. SO TONIGHT WE BRING TO YOU FOR DIFFERENT OPTIONS. THOSE OPTIONS ARE ON THE LARGE LIGHT SHEET. THE FIRST 3 OPTIONS KEEP A LEVEL TAX RATE AND $2.47. THE FINAL OPTION, OPTION D IT DOES INCREASE THE TAX RATE BY ABOUT $0.19 OVERALL. I THOUSAND PER ASSESSED VALUES. OPTION A, IT PRIORITIZES THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS LEVY. WE DO NOT OVERALL $2.57 TAX RATE STRUCTURE. ESTIMATED ANNUAL TAXES FOR THE FIRST 3 OPTIONS ARE $2056. THAT'S FOR HOMES VALUED AT $800,000. OPTION B THANKS ABOUT THE TAX RATE AND BALANCES EP AND OH DOLLARS AND DOLLARS FOR CONSTRUCTION. OPTION C PRIORITIZES CONSTRUCTION. SO STUDENT CAPACITY. AT OPTION T, PRIORITIZES BOTH EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS FOR STUDENTS BUT, IT ALSO FUNDS A CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS WE WILL TALK ABOUT A LITTLE BIT LATER IN THE PRESENTATION. GETTING INTO A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL AROUND THE OPTIONS. THIS IS WHERE I REALIZE THERE IS A LOT OF INFORMATION SO IF THE BOARD HAS QUESTIONS PLEASE JUST STOP AND ASK QUESTIONS. ERIC? >> THE ALL OF THE CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS AREN'T SAME FUNDED THROUGH LEVY NOT BOND. I DID SEE BOND ANYWHERE ON HERE. >> THEY QUEUE. BARBARA TOLD ME I WAS SUPPOSED TO MENTION THAT EARLIER THE PRESENTATION AND I BELIEVE I FORGOT. WE ARE NOT BRINGING YOU TONIGHT RECOMMENDATION FOR A BOND MEASURE IN 2022. >> YEP. OKAY. >> THANK YOU. SO DIGGING INTO A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL HERE, YOU CAN SEE THAT IN OPTION A WE ARE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE MAJORITY OF CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS DUE TO INCREASE EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS FUNDING. EVEN WITH THAT WE WILL NEED TO REDUCE BY ABOUT $5 MILLION STUDENT PROGRAMS AND STAFFING LEVELS. WITH HER CAPITAL PROJECTS AND THAT THIS WILL BE TRUE ACROSS THE BOARD. WE ARE REALLY ROLLING HAD THE CURRENT CAPITAL PROJECTS LEVY. SOME OF THE SAME LEVEL OF FUNDING, SAME TAX RATE TO MOVE THOSE PIECES FORWARD. THEN WITH CONSTRUCTION IN OPTION A KNOWING THAT WE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE BLUE WU OF WHAT ALL THIS MEANS IN REGARDS TO CONSTRUCTION AND HOW HEALTHY PRIORITIZES DIFFERENT NEEDS. REALLY OPTION A DOES NOT BRIDGE THAT GAP BETWEEN WHAT WE NEED IN THE DOLLARS AVAILABLE. IT DOES PROVIDE SOME LIMITED FUNDS DURING THE 4 YEAR CYCLE TO ADDRESS THE CAPACITY NEEDS AND THAT WOULD BE THROUGH THE USE OF PORTALS. OPTION B, STRIVES TO RELATE PROVIDE A BALANCE BETWEEN EP AND NO AND CONSTRUCTION. AND SO IT INCREASES THE DOLLARS FROM E O D WE WILL HAVE TO ELIMINATE ABOUT $15 MILLION WORTH OF STUDENT PROGRAMS AND STAFFING WITH OPTION SIMILAR CAPITAL PROJECTS AS I'VE SAID AND THEN THIS DOES INCREASE FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION. SO SOME FUNDS TO ADDRESS STUDENT CAPACITY NEEDS AND PORTABLES AND SOME ADDITION TO SCHOOLS. SOME ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COULD TAKE PLACE WITH THE OPTION B. IN OPTION C YOU WILL SEE PRIORITIZES LIMITED CONSTRUCTION AND SO SOME PRETTY SIGNIFICANT CUTS TO OUR PROGRAMS FOR STUDENTS AND STAFFING. TO THE TUNE OF ABOUT $25 MILLION WORTH OF REDUCTIONS. AND THEN, WITH THIS OPTION DOES PROVIDE FUNDS DURING A 4 YEAR CYCLE TO ADDRESS CAPACITY NEEDS THROUGH PORTALS AND ADDITIONS. EACH OF THE OPTIONS A, B AND C DO NOT PROVIDE THE LEVEL OF FUNDING TO ACTUALLY FUND WHAT WE HAVE IDENTIFIED AS ARE CRITICAL CAPACITY PROJECTS. OPTION D, PROVIDES LEVEL OF FUNDING FOR EP KNOW THAT OPTION A PROVIDES. SO IT'S THAT SAME LEVEL YET THE CONSTRUCTION ATEGY IS A 6 YEAR CAPITAL LEVY WHICH WOULD BE IT [00:15:17] WOULD BE A SEPARATE OF 8 MEASURE. I'M SAYING THAT LOOKING AT BARBARA I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT WE DISCUSSED SET TE CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION LEVY WHICH WOULD FUNDING OR COMPLETE SHORT-TERM CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS. THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED AND PRIORITIZED. I'M GOING TO HAND THIS OVER TO BARBARA TO GO OVER OUR EDUCATION PROGRAMS OPERATIONS, CAPITAL OPTIONS AND CAPITAL PROGRAMS. >> THANK YOU. GOING TO THE AM GOING TO GO OVER JUST A REMINDER SOME OF THE SLIDES WE SAW IN OUR APRIL STUDY SESSION. JUST A REMINDER FOR THE E PIANO THE LEVY PROVIDES FOR ENRICHMENT T ACTIVITIES BUT THE ALITY THE STATE DOESN'T FULLY FUND WHAT IT ES TO PROVIDE THE EDUCATION THAT OUR COMMUNITY EXPECTS. SO THE LEVY IS THERE AND PROVIDES THAT 14 PERCENT OF OUR GENERAL FUND BUDGET.IN THE CAVITY GORES OF STAFFING FOR PROGRAMS, SAFETY, STATE AND SECURITY. PROFESSIONAL LEARNING, ACTIVITIES AND ATHLETICS, ADDITIONAL COURSE OFFERINGS LIKE OUR SEVENTH. DAY. SUMMER SCHOOL AND CURRENTLY EARLY LEARNING. THE AS ANOTHER VIEW OF ONCE THE STATE FUNDS IN THE BLUE AND WHAT THE DISTRICT OR THE LEVY FUNDS. YOU WILL SEE, FOR EXAMPLE THE BIGGEST AREA OF SPENDING YOU CAN SEE THE EVENT THAT THERE IS SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT STAFF ESTATE DOES NOT PROVIDE FUNDING FOR. ACTIVITIES AND ATHLETICS, THERE IS NO FUNDING AT ALL FOR ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC.LASS STAFF. WE HIRED FOR CLASSIFIED STAFF ESTATE PROVIDES FUNDING FOR. CERTIFICATE ADMINISTRATORS ALSO ESTATE DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH FUNDING FOR THE COST OF OUR ADMINISTRATORS. TO SUPPORT OUR BUILDINGS AND STUDENTS AND TEACHERS. PSALMS, THE STATE FUNDS VERY LITTLE MNEMONIC FOR SUBSTITUTES. THEY EXPECT EACH TEACHER TO BE GONE ONE DAY. OUR ACTUAL COST NEEDS TO BE FUNDED OUT OF A LOCAL LEVY. SUPERIORS IN OPERATING COST. THAT ACTUALLY IS FULLY FUNDED BY THE STATE. THAT IS ONE AREA, CTE PROGRAM IS SELF SUPPORTIVE ESTATE. THAT'S ENHANCED. RUNNING START/ELITE IS A STEP SELF-SUPPORTING PROGRAM. PECIAL AND IS ANOTHER BIG AREA WITH THE STATE, WE ARE SPENDING ABOUT $19 MILLION MORE THAN THE STATE ACTUALLY FUNDS AS THE COST CONTINUE TO GROW. GIFTED, EL AL, TRANSPORTATION, THOSE ARE ALL FUNDS AND PROGRAMS ARE NOT FULLY FUNDED BY THE STATE. THIS SLIDE SHOWS OUR FUTURE PROJECTIONS. ALL OF THOSE LOCAL COST CONTINUE TO ADD UP WITH INFLATION OR INCREASED DUE TO INFLATION. THAT'S GREAT AS YOU CAN SEE AND NEGATIVE FISCAL GAP. OUR REVENUES IS SHOWN BY THE BLUE LINE. THEY ARE LESS THAN ONGOING EXPENDITURE NEEDS. WE HAVE A GAP BETWEEN OUR REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES OF ABOUT $20 MILLION. THAT GAP CONTINUES TO GROW. SO, JUST A REMINDER AS WELL THE HISTORY OF THE PML LEVY. IN 2018 THE NEW LAW PASSED. WE THOUGHT REDUCE LEVY FUNDS BECAUSE THEY CHANGED THE LEVY LABOR DEPARTMENT. WE THOUGHT REDUCE LEVY FUNDS DURING THAT YEAR. WE DO THE LEVY WAS NEW AND WE DIDN'T KNOW HOW THIS WOULD PLAY OUT FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS. WE HAD TO EVALUATE THE NEW FUNDING SYSTEM DURING THESE LAST 4 YEARS. AS I MENTIONED WE HAVE A FISCAL GAP BETWEEN OUR EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES DUE TO THE STATE FUNDING CONTINUING TO NOT KEEP UP WITH COST. IF OUR CURRENT LEVY FILES CONTINUE THE DISTRICT WILL NEED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ABOUT 5 MILLION TO ALMOST $9 MILLION IN THE ANNUAL STUDENT PROGRAM AND STAFFING CUTS OVER THE NEXT 4 YEARS. [00:20:03] WE RUN OUR EXPENDITURES IN ALIGNMENT WITH OUR RESOURCES. WE DO KNOW THAT EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS LEVY CAN PROVIDE ABOUT 15 MORE MILLION MORE DOLLARS IN REVENUE TO MAINTAIN STUDENT PROGRAMS AND STAFFING. SO, THIS IS A LIST OF POTENTIAL AREAS THAT COULD SEE PROGRAMS AND STAFFING CUTS. THESE ARE POTENTIAL AREAS. SUCH AS STAFFING FULL CERTIFICATE ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLASSIFIED. SEL/MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, HEALTH AND SAFETY, SAFETY AND SECURITY, PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IS FUNDED BY OUR LEVY OUR NEW TEACHER SUPPORT LIKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS A ROBUST TRAINING PROGRAM AND MAKES OUR DISTRICT VERY ATTRACTIVE TO NEW TEACHERS. THE EXTRA DAYS WE . TEACHERS, 8 EXTRA DAYS BEYOND THE SCHOOL YEAR BECAUSE WE KNOW THEY NEED PLANNING TIME TO COME IN BEFORE SCHOOL STARTS AND ADDITIONAL COURSE OFFERINGS THAT I MENTIONED. SPECIAL EDUCATION, HIGHER CAPABLE PSALMS, EARLY LEARNING, MUSIC AND ART PROGRAMS AND ATHLETICS AND ACTIVITIES. SO WHEN WE TALK TO THE BOND ADVISORY AND LEAVY. >> WHAT WE NEED TO TAP INTO? >> JUST HAD THE SHOUT. >> TRYING TO WORK MY MIND THROUGH IMPACT OF WONDERING HOW COULD WE REDUCE SPECIAL EDUCATION NOT ONLY, IS IT THE RIGHT THING TO FUND BUT WERE ALSO MANDATED. >> ABSOLUTELY. NEXT I RELIANCE WE HAVE A BIG SHORTFALL ALREADY. >> SO NONE OF THESE ARE SET IN STONE. THESE ARE ALL THE DIFFERENT PLACES THAT ARE FUNDED BY THE LEVY. WE WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS WHICH WOULD BE PART OF THE BUDGET PROCESS. WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT ALL OF OUR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES WE HAVE SUPPORTS THAT GO BEYOND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES. THAT WOULD BE TRUE FOR THE MAJORITY OF OUR PROGRAMS. YOU WOULD BE IDENTIFYING, ARE THERE SERVICES THAT WILL BE BENEFICIAL AND ART REQUIRED? AND GOING THROUGH THAT LIST WITH THE MAJORITY OF THESE PLACES, ARE THERE PROGRAMS AND OTHER PLACES THAT WE COULD SHIFT THOSE DOLLARS. MAYBE THERE IS SOMETHING ON THIS LIST OR SOMETHING THAT ISN'T ON THIS LIST THAT WOULD BE RE-PRIORITIZED. KNOWING THAT THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT FISCAL GAP. JUST TO BE TRANSPARENT WITH ALL OF THE DIFFERENT PLACES THAT ARE CURRENTLY FUNDED THROUGH LEVY AND KNOWING SOME OF THOSE PIECES THAT ARE FUNDED BY LEVY ACTUALLY WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TOUCH BECAUSE IT'S CONTRACTUAL. SOME OF THOSE THINGS ARE STAFFING AND ARE SUBSTITUTE COST. THE MAJORITY OF HER SUBSTITUTE COST ARE ALREADY CONTRACTUAL. WE CAN'T REDUCE THE NUMBER OF DAYS SOMEONE IS OUT SICK. EVEN IF THEY DON'T HAVE ANY QUOTE UNQUOTE ÃREMAINING WE STILL NEED EDUCATOR IN THE CLASSROOM. IT'S GOING THROUGH ALL OF THAT TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATIONS OF EACH LEVY DOG THAT IS BEING SPENT TO UNDERSTAND. ISN'T ONE OF THOSE THAT CAN BE RE-PRIORITIZED OR REQUIRED? >> WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT GAP SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING. ABOUT 2 MILLION. IT'LL BE VERY TRICKY. >> HELLO? ETC. GO. ON THAT LIST AT SOME POINT ANOINT WITH THE ACTUAL DOLLAR AMOUNT FROM THE LEVY WOULD BE GREAT. >> WE SHARED WITH THEM THE OPTIONS A, B AND C WE WILL GET MORE DETAIL. WHEN WE ASKED THEM WHAT'S HER PREFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE E PIANO OPTIONS, MAJORITY OF THEM WANTED A BALANCED APPROACH. WHEN WE ASKED THEM ABOUT 40 0 PERCENT WITH PRIORITIZING THE [00:25:01] P&L. THIS WAS A SMALL . SO TAKE THAT IN MIND WE LOOK AT THOSE PERCENTAGES. THAT WAS THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. I WANT TO AGAIN GIVE YOU THE HIGH LEVEL OF REMINDER OF WHAT ARE CAPITAL OBJECTS AND LEAVY PROVIDES. THE STATE DOES NOT PROVIDE FUNDING FOR MAJORITY OF OUR TECHNOLOGIES NOR FOR OUR CONTINUED WHAT WE CALL LIFE CYCLE MAINTENANCE OF OUR HVAC. THE STATE DOES NOT PROVIDE FUNDING. WE GO TO OUR COMMUNITIES AND WE RENEW THE CAPITAL PROJECTS LEVY. IT FUNDS ONGOING MAINTENANCE. OUR TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMS. WE ARE SEEKING ASSISTANCE CONSISTENT LEVEL OF FUNDING FOR LEVEL AND IT'S AVAILABLE EVERY 4 YEARS. ALL THE OPTIONS YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU HAVE CONSISTENT CAPITAL PROJECTS AND LOVING SPIRIT WHEN NOT ASKING FOR ONE OPTION MORE AND ONE OPTION HIGHER THEY ARE ALL BASICALLY KEEPING OUR SAME LEVEL WITHIN THE LEVY. THIS IS JUST A REMINDER OF OUR FACILITIES. THE CATEGORIES WE THEN SPEND FUNDS ON OUR FACILITIES, BUILDING SYSTEMS AND IMPROVEMENTS. THE LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT I TALKED ABOUT. SCHOOL AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS. WERE ADDRESSING THE BUILDING NEEDS SUCH AS PORTABLES. WE WANT FULL COMPLIANCE HEALTH AND SAFETY. AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ATHLETIC AND PLAYFIELD UPGRADES. NEXT AREA TECHNOLOGY IT'S FOR FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY. WE WILL MOVE TO THE NEXT LINE. THERE'S 5 AREAS WHERE WE PROVIDE SUPPORT. TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUPPORT THAT'S OUR NETWORK, OUR STORAGE SYSTEMS OUR PHONE SYSTEMS. EQUIPMENT, OUR STAFF AND STUDENT COMPUTERS AGAIN THAT CAME IN HANDY DURING THE PANDEMIC MEANING ADDITIONAL LAPTOPS ARE INSTRUCTIONAL SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT AND ASSESSMENT TOOLS TO SUPPORT OUR STUDENT LEARNING. OUR BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS. THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO RUN PAYROLL, TO RUN HUMAN RESOURCES AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ETC. OUR TECHNOLOGY TRAINING AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. MAKING SURE OUR TEACHERS ARE TRAINED ON OUR INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND SOFTWARE. SO THE NEXT PIECE I WANT TO GO OVER IS THE BACKGROUND ON OUR STUDENT CAPACITY NEEDS FOR CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION. AS WE SHARED IN APRIL THE DISTRICT HAS COME OH SORRY, THE DISTRICT HAS OVER 900 MILLION OF LONG-TERM STUDENT CAPACITY CONSTRUCTION NEEDS. OUR FACILITY ADVISOR PROVIDED RECORDATIONS TO BUILD MORE SCHOOLS ARE REBUILT IN A LARGE AGING FACILITIES. AND THEY ALSO CONTINUE TO INDICATE A STRONG DESIRE TO REDUCE THE USE OF PORTABLES. SO, SHORT-TERM AND AGAIN I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS IN MORE DETAIL ON THE NEXT SLIDES. WE BELIEVE WE HAVE CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS OF $232 MILLION. AGAIN THE FACILITY ADVISORY RECOMMENDED ALMOST $900 MILLION OF CAPACITY NEEDS. WE WILL TALK ABOUT INITIAL SHORT-TERM NEEDS. SO WE KNOW WITHOUT ANY CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DO ANY CLASSROOM ADDITIONS. WE WOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO PLACE PORTABLES WITH ANY FUNDS WE RECEIVED WITH IMPACT FEES. IMPACT FEES VARY WITHIN CONSTRUCTION. WE GET MORE IMPACT FEES IF THERE'S NOT A LOT OF CONSTRUCTION GOING ON THAT WE DON'T GET A LOT OF IMPACT FEES. THE MORE MORE DEVELOPMENT IS A MULTI FAMILY AND HER IMPACT FEES ARE LOWER WITH THOSE AS WELL. ANYTHING ADDITIONAL THAT WE GET FROM IMPACT FEES WOULD REQUIRE REPRIORITIZE STATION. REQUIRED ACTIONS FOR PROJECTS. WE MAY BEAT WOULD NOT REPLACE A RUEFUL BOILER TO PROVIDE CAPACITY. SHALL OTHER QUIRED ACTIONS WITHOUT FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND CAPACITIES INCREASING CLASS SIZE BUT WOULD REBOUND STUDENTS FROM LEARNING AREAS [00:30:01] AND CONTINUE TO REDUCE THE STANDARD OF SERVICE THAT IS EACH IN OUR SCHOOLS WE HAVE ART AND SCIENCE-BASED. WE HAVE SPECIFIC SAVERS FOR RESEARCH ROOMS. AND THOSE AREAS WE HAVE SHARED LEARNING THOSE AREAS HAVE TO BE REDUCE WHAT THEY'RE ALREADY BEING REDUCED TO PROVIDE SPACE. >> HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. AS YOU TALK ABOUT THE REDUCED SERVICE AT THIS POINT. SO KNOWING THAT WAS A BIG PIECE OF THE TASK FORCE. FROM THERE WHERE WE AT WITH HER LEVEL TO STANDARD SERVICE WITHIN OUR SCHOOLS AT THIS POINT IN TIME? ESPECIALLY SINCE WE HAVE INVESTED SO MUCH OF A STRUCTURE RECOGNIZING THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AT THE SAME TIME AND UNDERSTANDING WERE RAT WITH FUNDING. >> WE CAN PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THAT. WITH 2 NEW SCHOOLS IN THE AREA AND THE ADDITIONAL. [INDISCERNABLE]. AGAIN WE WILL GET YOU THAT INFORMATION. AND. [INDISCERNABLE]. >> THANKS. >> DOCTOR STEWART HAS A QUESTION. LET ME SEE IF I CAN DO THIS. >> THANK YOU. I'M SORRY BUT PANTS UP A LITTLE BIT. GOING BACK TO WHAT JOHN WAS SAYING IN RESPONSE TO SONDRA'S QUESTION. THE SPECIAL SERVICES PERHAPS BEING ON THE BOARD AS WELL. YET THERE ARE THINGS THAT REQUIRE JOHN THE BEEN MISINTERPRETING WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. YOUR SAME SOME PARTS OF THAT THAT'S BEYOND THE STANDARD OF SERVICE IN THESE VARIOUS CATEGORIES. WHAT ARE YOU CONSIDERING BEYOND THE STANDARD OF SERVICE AND SPECIAL ED? >> SO SPECIFICALLY B. >> YOU'RE CUTTING OUT. >> WE KNOW THAT THE BENEFIT TO PROVIDE TO THE STUDENT PROGRAMMING SUPPORTING DATA COLLECTION AROUND FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ANALYSES. AND PROVIDES SUPPORT. DO NOT RELATE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROGRAM. IT'S JUST GOING THROUGH AND EVALUATING ALL OF THOSE PIECES KNOWING THAT WE ALSO HAVE A FEDERAL REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR OUR STUDENTS THAT ARE ALL FINE. IT'S NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING THAT IS BEING REDUCED AS WE SPEAK. IT'S MORE, THESE ARE ALL 90 LEVY FUNDED. WE WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH A THOROUGH ANALYSIS. >> OKAY. THE OTHER QUESTION GOES BACK TO WHEN YOU HAVE A LIST OF POSSIBLE AREAS THAT YOU WILL LOOK AT FIRST. AT SPENDING. WHEN IT'S AND STAFF IT SAID ADMINISTRATIVE. IT'S NOT ONLY BUILDING ADMINISTRATION OR IS NOT OFFICE ADMINISTRATION OR EVERYTHING? >> ADMINISTRATIVE STUFF WOULD BE OUR BUILDING ADMINISTRATORS, ARE ESSENTIAL ADMINISTRATORS. >> OKAY. THAT'S FINE. >> THAT STAFFING LIST IS A COMPREHENSIVE LIST THAT POINTS TO EVERYONE. >> OKAY. THANK YOU I WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD IT THANK YOU. >> AS JOHN MENTIONED AT THIS TIME WERE NOT DISCUSSING BONDS. WE DID WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THERE IS A COUPLE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM OPTIONS. SO SHORT-TERM LEVY WOULD BE IDENTIFYING THE REQUIRED CAPACITY PROJECTS DURING THE NEXT 6 YEARS. IN A 4 OR 6 YEAR COMPACT CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION. IT WOULD FUN ARE CRITICAL CAPACITY PROJECTS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE CLASSROOM FOR STUDENTS. LONGER-TERM IN THE 26 TO 28 TIMEFRAME. YOU WILL HAVE A LEVY STRATEGY OR BOND STRATEGY. AGAIN THE LEVY'S TRAGEDY A PRETTY LONG TERM FOR THIS FACILITY PLAN, REBUILDING/ENLARGING AG FACILITY, ADDING NEW SCHOOLS AND PURCHASING LAND. WE WOULD DO AN ONGOING REVIEW WILL OF THE 6 YEAR CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION LEVY TO MAINTAIN THE TAX RATE. WHICH WE WILL CONTINUE TO REVIEW THE LEVY. [00:35:10] THE PURPOSE IS TO FUND THE LONG-TERM FACILITY PLAN.WE WILL ALSO USE A BOND STRATEGY TO DO THAT. AGAIN KEEPING THE FUNDING LONG-TERM FACILITY PLAN FOR A BOND MEASURE TOTALING 700 TO 900 MILLION. AND FUND THE LONG-TERM FACILITY PLAN. >> I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE BOND TERM DECISION DOESN'T HAVE TO BE MADE TODAY OR IN THE 2022 CYCLE. I THINK WE CAN MAKE THAT DETERMINATION OVER THE NEXT 3 YEARS DEBITING ON WHAT DIRECTION WE GO. WE WILL INDICATE TO SIGN WITH A TIMELINE IS TO MAKE THAT DECISION. LET'S SAY WE BRING IN THE BONUS LEVEL OF CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS. THAT WILL REQUIRE US TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD TO SAY WHAT IS THE TIMELINE FOR WHEN WE NEED TO GO BACK IN AND SEEK ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION. KINDA DEPENDING ON A FEW THINGS WE DON'T HAVE TO MAKE THAT LONG TERM DECISION TODAY. THERE IS GOOD INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT IS A LONG-TERM ONGOING LOBBY, WHAT IS AN OUTCOME. WE NOTE THOSE DOLLARS DON'T COME IN UP FRONT. WE KNOW IT'S LESS DOLLARS OVER A PERIOD OF TIME. OVER THE LONG TERM IT COULD BE A VIABLE STRATEGY. THERE'S JUST PROS AND CONS TO DOING SO. WITH THE BOND WE KNOW THAT ONE OF THE BIGGEST HURDLES IS THAT 60 PERCENT MAJORITY. ALTHOUGH YOU GET THOSE DOLLARS UP FRONT ONCE YOU DO PASS THAT BOND TO BE ABLE TO BUILD YOUR CAPITAL. >> IF I COULD ASK WHAT ARE THE NUMBER OF REASONS OF NOT HAVING A BOND? >> SO A COUPLE THINGS. ONE, WITH LOOKING AT HER HISTORY RIGHT NOW. WE'VE PASSED ONE BOND MEASURE IN 10 OR 11 YEARS. THAT MAJORITY IS A THRESHOLD THAT WOULD COME CLOSE TO BUT, EVEN WITH THE LOSS BOND WERE AT 54 PERCENT APPROVAL WHICH PUTS US BELOW THE NEEDED THRESHOLD KNOWING THAT OUR EPN NO ENTER CAPITAL PROJECTS LEVY OVERSEE 54 PERCENT APPROVAL THE LAST TIME WE WENT OUT. AND OVER COVID YES THE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT PROVIDED THE MOST IN-PERSON OF ANY DISTRICT IN THE REGION. OVER THE LAST MONTHS OF SCHOOL. KNOWING THAT GIVEN THERE WERE SOME STRENGTHS IN OUR APPROACH. THERE WERE FAMILIES THAT WERE FRUSTRATED OVER THE LAST YEAR TO THE POINT WHERE FOR THEM FUNDING BECAME THEIR WAY OF COMMUNICATING MY SUPPORT IS NOW GONE. SO IN CONSIDERATION OF ALL THAT IDENTIFYING THE STRATEGY THAT POTENTIALLY MAKES MORE SENSE FROM AN ABILITY TO HAVE AN ONGOING CYCLE DOLLAR AMOUNT ISN'T AS LARGE. THAT COULD ALSO HELP SOME OF OUR COMMUNITY MEMBERS. IT'S A SHORTER TIMELINE. THAT'S WHY ALL THAT PUT TOGETHER WE LANDED ON LEVY STRATEGY PARTICULARLY THE SHORT TERM OVER THE NEXT 4 TO 6 YEARS. >> ASSUMING WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY I DON'T KNOW WHICH ONES WERE ON THE BALANCE OF HER OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN THE STATE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THOSE OUTCOMES WERE. IN THE LAST YEAR. >> I THINK HER NEIGHBORS UP NORTH AND BONDS AND DUE TO COVID DID NOT PASS. [INDISCERNABLE]. I HAVE TO GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER DISTRICTS. OTHER DISTRICTS LIKE ÃTHERE TO RUN A BOND MANY TIMES. [INDISCERNABLE]. >> WE ALSO HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT LAKE WASHINGTON IS ONE OF THE FEW DISTRICTS THAT HAVE US IN ANTI- ÃCAMPAIGN. IT'S JUST THE REALITY. IT'S PART OF OUR WORK. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT AS WE GO OUT TELLING OUR STORY TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES ABOUT KIDS IN THE WORK WE DO CAN ALSO HELP WITH ANY OF THE [00:40:07] STRATEGIES. >> AND LOOKING AT THAT VALUES WE MENTION AS I LOOK AT THE PHYSICAL RESPONSIBLE DATE. RECOGNIZE A DESIRE TO NOT HAVE TO GO OUT THAT LONG. BECAUSE WE HAVE ABOUT. [INDISCERNABLE]. THERE'S ALWAYS THAT QUESTION WHEN WILL THIS HAPPEN. I THINK IT WILL DO A DISSERVICE IF WE DON'T CONSIDER HOW THIS LONG-TERM BASIS ALL THESE PIECES. >> WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION. I DON'T KNOW IF WE PACKAGE IT TONIGHT. WE HAVE THE INFORMATION AROUND THE FUNDING STRAIN AND SPONSOR PAID OFF AND WHEN WE COULD ACTUALLY START MENTALLY THE NEW CAPACITY BUT REPLACING AG FACILITY AS WELL. SO WE HAVE AN INFORMATION. >> ONE MOMENT MARK. GO AHEAD. >> I UNDERSTAND THE FRUSTRATION OF NOT BEING ABLE TO TOP INTO THE BOND AVENUE. I JUST THINK AND I AGREE WITH SEAN AT THIS POINT. THAT A REPUBLIC WILL NOT STAND FOR IT. THE ANGER OUT THERE IS VERY PALPABLE. AND I THINK WE HAVE TO BE LOOKING AT THE LEVY STRATEGY I THINK IT WILL TAKE A LONG CAMPAIGN TO GET THE BACK ON UPON TRACK IT'S NOT GONNA BE JUST A SHORT-TERM CAMPAIGN THAT WILL BE A LONG-TERM CAMPAIGN. THE ANGER OUT THERE WAS STRESS PALPABLE. WITH THAT SAID THE STRANGE THING IS THE ANTI- VOICES FROM NORTH SHORE TRONIC, LAKE WASHINGTON WAS DOING WHILE NORTH SHORE WAS TOUTING HOW NORTH SHORE WAS DOING. EVERYONE THANKS IT'S WORSE THEIR TURF IN THE OTHER DISTRICTS. IT'S GOING TO TAKE A MINDSET CHANGE. >>. >> MANY GO THROUGH EACH LEARNING AREA. WE USE FLOW ANALYTICS AND USE OF PROJECTIONS FROM THE 2028 SCHOOL YEAR. WE UPDATE OBJECTIONS THROUGH JANUARY 2021. WE TOOK THE CURRENT PROJECTIONS AND REDUCED A MOMENT THEN THEY MADE ASSUMPTIONS OF 85 PERCENT RETURN IN FEDERAL RATE. BE SURE THAT JANUARY. WE WENT THROUGH A LOOK CAN'T WHAT ARE THE CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS.OT LOOKING AT REALLY TOTAL SHORTFALL IN CAPACITY NOT LOOKING AT TRYING TO REPLACE PORTALS OR THINGS LIKE THAT. WHAT ARE OUR CRITICAL NEEDS? WITH THAT LENS WE WENT THROUGH EACH LEARNING AREA. IN THE WA-NEE.LEARNING AREA YOU WILL SEE AT THAT MIDDLE LEVEL IF YOU LOOK AT THE TOTAL SHORTFALL. THE SHORTFALL TOTAL WHERE IT'S STARTING TO COME IN THIS RIGHT NOW OVERCAPACITY WE HAVE ABOUT 44 STUDENTS AND BY 26/27 IT'S OVERCAPACITY BY 240 STUDENTS. THERE IS SOME ROOM THERE BETWEEN AND HILL AND THROUGH PORTABLES TO ADDRESS THE CAPACITY. MAINLY IF YOU BREAK OUT BETWEEN THE 2 MIDDLE SCHOOLS. WILL HEAD TO THE NEXT LEARNING AREA. THEN IN LAKE WASHINGTON UNIT AREA YOU JUST PUT AN ADDITION ON LAKE WASHINGTON. THAT SCHOOLS CURRENT RAPIDLY. WE STILL NEED TO ADDRESS THE CAPACITY SHORTFALL AT THE HIGH SCHOOL. AND SO WE CONTINUE TO RECOMMEND THE FACILITY ADVISORY RECOMMENDED CHOICE HIGH SCHOOL THE LAKE WASHINGTON AREA. AND THEN IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AREA THIS IS ROSE HILL IN KIRKLAND. YOU CAN SEE THE TOTAL SHORTFALL IS A MUST 300 STUDENTS IN 2025. [00:45:03] IN ADDITION TO KIRKLAND, MIDDLE OR ANY PORTABLES OR RE-BOUNDARY. SO AGAIN, AT THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL THERE ACTUALLY, THEY'RE FINE RIGHT NOW AT THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL IF YOU LOOK AT TOTAL SHORTFALL. THIS IS THE ADDITIONS, WE ADDED 20 CLASSES IN LAKE WASHINGTON AREA. I WILL SAY LAKE WASHINGTON AREA, THEY SUFFER THE MOST LOSS ENROLLMENT IN COVID. AND WHEN THAT COMES BACK IS PROJECTIONS WILL MOST LIKELY CHANGE. SO THERE'S THAT NOTE THERE. THIS LOOKED VERY DIFFERENT THROUGH COVID IN LAKE WASHINGTON AREA. >> DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS AT THIS POINT IN TIME HAVE ACTUALLY REGISTERED? DO WE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THAT DATA? >> YEP, WE TARGET EVERY WEEK. SO RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ABOUT 1850 STUDENTS REGISTERED FOR PROTECTING WINTER DOORS OPEN AND THE FAULT WILL BE AT 1950. THAT'S WHAT WERE BUDGETING. IN A NORMAL KINDERGARTEN CLASS IS 2300 STUDENTS. SO WE ARE STILL DOWN AND CAN A GARDEN TO WHERE WE NORMALLY WORK. HOPING, OR WATCHING IT NUMBER HOPING THAT TREND KEEPS GOING UP. WERE WATCHING IT. >> WHAT YOU SAID WERE DOWN OVER NORMALLY WORK. I DIDN'T QUITE CATCH THAT. >> ARE NORMAL KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT IS 2300 EACH YEAR. 2300 STUDENTS. WE ARE PROJECTING 1900 STUDENTS. >> ARE YOU SEEING ANY OF THE INCREASE IN FIRST GRADERS? >> WE ARE GETTING THE 10 PERCENT BUMP THAT WE GET BETWEEN KINDERGARTEN AND FIRST GRADE. NOT GETTING, THERE'S AN ASSUMPTION OUT THERE THAT FAMILIES WILL SKIP KINDERGARTEN AND DOUBLE REGISTRATION FIRST GRADE. THAT'S NOT HAPPENING. OKAY, IN THE REDMOND LEARNING AREA I'LL START FROM THE BOTTOM. WE JUST OPEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS THERE. YOU COULD SEE HER TOTAL SHORTFALL STILL HAVE A LOT OF PORTALS IN THE REDMOND AREA. WE NEEDED THEM IN THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL. GO AHEAD. BY SCHOOL ISSUES. REDMOND ELEMENTARY AND THIS CHART NEEDED TO BE LIKE THIS. THIS CHART NEEDED TO BE, I NEEDED A NOTE ON THE ELEMENTARY, I APOLOGIZE. THERE ARE SCHOOL BY SCHOOL ISSUES AND ELEMENTARY. DOWNTIME REDMOND WERE EXPECTING SIGNIFICANT INCOME HOUSING. WHICH WE EXPECT TO DRIVE A LOT OF THE STUDENTS. REDMOND ELEMENTARY'S ARE SHE PROJECTING TO BE OVERCAPACITY BY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS. WE ARE STILL RECOMMENDING SOME CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS IN THE REDMOND AREA. SO I APOLOGIZE. I WILL FIX THIS LINE TONIGHT AND GET IT REPOSTED. AND THEN AT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL WE HAVE AGAIN AT SOME SHORTFALL AT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL SPECIFICALLY REDMOND MIDDLE SCHOOL. WE WILL NEED TO LOOK AT POTENTIAL ADDITION OF PORTABLES AND RE-BOUNDARY. AT THE HIGH SCHOOL. LAKE WASHINGTON CAPACITY NEEDS AT A HIGH SCHOOL SO LOOKING AT AND VALUE IN ADDITION REDMOND HIGH SCHOOL AND/OR CHOICE HIGH SCHOOL IN THE REDMOND EAST LAKE AREA. SO THE LAST SLIDE IS EAST LAKE. SO SAME AT THE HIGH SCHOOL A SLIGHT SHORTFALL. LOOKING AT CHOICE HIGH SCHOOL THERE. OUR MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL RIGHT NOW SO FAR HAS CAPACITY AND ELEMENTARY WITH THE CARCINOGEN ADDITION HAS CAPACITY. AGAIN POTENTIAL BOUNDARIES FOR SCHOOLS. I'M SORRY NEED A DRINK OF WATER. >> I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE WHILE WE DON'T HAVE A MIDDLE SCHOOL SHORTFALL ANY SLIGHT COMMUNITY. YOU THINK ABOUT THE SIZE OF INGLEWOOD. JESS ADDED ADDITIONAL PORTABLES. [00:50:03] WHILE THE CAPACITY NUMBERS DON'T ALWAYS SHOW A NEED. YOU THINK ABOUT AS WE DO ADDITIONS IN OUR SCHOOLS CONTINUES TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS THAT ARE ON CAMPUS THAT INCREASES THE NUMBER OF CARS ENTERING OUR CAMPUSES. AND SO THOSE ARE ALL THE CONSIDERATIONS TO MAKE. SUCH AS EASTLAKE. YOU CAN SEE THERE IS SCHOOL OF CAPACITY OF OVER 2300. THAT'S BECAUSE OF ALL OF THE WORK WE'VE DONE TO INCREASE CAPACITY BOTH THROUGH ADDITIONS BY MODIFYING SOME OF THE INTERIOR SPACES TO BE EITHER PLANNING SPACES OR ACTUAL CLASSROOMS. WE'VE DONE A LOT OF WORK TO INCREASE CAPACITY. DOESN'T ALWAYS TELL THE FULL STORY. >> ARE RIGHT, JUST TO SUMMARIZE THE AS OUR SHORT-TERM CRITICAL CAPACITIES THROUGH 2027. THE FIRST SCHOOL AS I MENTIONED THERE WERE BASED ON à PROJECTIONS BEING COMPARED FOR THIS JANUARY. 85 PERCENT RETURN OF OUR COVID LOSS. JUANITA THE MIDDLE SCHOOL. LAKE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY. REDMOND ELEMENTARY MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL. AND THEN EASTLAKE HIGH SCHOOL. HOWEVER WE DID LOOK AT OUR PROJECTIONS BASED ON STUDENTS WE HAVE TODAY AND ASSUMING NO COVID RETURN. JUST MOVING AHEAD WITH STUDENTS WE HAVE RIGHT NOW AND AVERAGE PER KINDERGARTEN. SO BASED ON THE WE WOULD NEED CAPACITY IN THE RED ELEMENTARY AND ELEMENTARY MIDDLE SCHOOLS. SO THE , OH, SORRY. ONE OF THE THINGS WE DID ASK FOR BOND AND LEVY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FEEDBACK ON AND ABOUT THE BOND RECOMMENDATION AND 93 PERCENT AGREED NOT TO RECOMMEND THE BOND MEASURE IN 2020. 7 THINGS JOHN TALKED ABOUT. JUST THEIR FEEDBACK TO CHALLENGING THE PASS PERCENTAGE RATE AND JUST CURRENT CONCERN ABOUT THE PASSAGE RATE AND THAT IS WHY, I'M JUST LOOKING AT THEIR NOTES HERE. IT'S HARD TO PERSUADE OUR VOTERS TO PASS ON IT. SO THESE ARE SUMMARY OF THE PRODUCTS NEEDED FOR CRITICAL CAPACITY BASED ON STABILITY ELEMENTARY CAPACITY IN REDMOND AGAIN WE'VE LISTED THE COST OF THE SECOND COLUMN IN THE YEAR THAT WE NEED TO PROVIDE THAT CAPACITY. ELEMENTARY CAPACITY IN REDMOND AROUND 53 MILLION THAT'S A SMALLER NOT FULL 690 STUDENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JUST ADDITIONAL CAPACITY. YOU'LL NEED THAT AND FOLLOW 2023. SHOULD THE DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE BE WHERE WE THINK IT IS. AGAIN WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE. THE ONE NEEDED LEARNING AREA THEN HE'LL. WE WOULD PUT AN ADDITION ON FINN HILL. IN LAKE WASHINGTON AREA KIRKLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL LOOKING AT AN ADDITION THERE. REDMOND LEARNING AREA MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY LOOKING AT ADDITIONAL PORTABLES AND/OR RE-BOUNDARY. THE REDMOND LEARNING AREA HIGH SCHOOL THAT WOULD BE ADDITION FOR CHOICE HIGH SCHOOL AND THEN THE LAKE WASHINGTON LEARNING AREA, A CHOICE HIGH SCHOOL THERE AS WELL. ALL OF THOSE PROJECTS $193 MILLION. AND IF ANYTIME WE NEED CONSTRUCTION WE HAVE CONTINGENCY MF TO ESTIMATE THE COST DEPENDING ON WHEN THOSE BUILDINGS OPEN AND WE KNOW THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES TO INCREASE SUBSTANTIALLY. APPROXIMATELY 231 MILLION IN JUST THE MINIMUM CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS IS WHAT WE'VE PUT TOGETHER AND DETERMINED. >> SO BEFORE ERIC ASKED HIS QUESTION. HOW DID WE LAND ON THIS LIST? WE MAY NOT HIT THE 85 PERCENT MARK THAT FLOW ANALYTICS. WE ALSO DON'T THINK OUR CURRENT WILL HIT THE RIGHT METHOD EITHER. WHEN SHE WENT SCHOOL BY SCHOOL OVER THE NEXT 5 8 AND 10 YEARS TO LOOK AT THE SCHOOL NEEDS. KNOWING THAT THERE MAY BE SOME [00:55:06] LEVEL OF CAPACITY WITHIN AREA OR A LOCAL SCHOOL. WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT, LET'S JUST TAKE REDMOND ELEMENTARY. CORRECT ME IF YOU HAVE THE EXACT NUMBER. THEY ARE GOING TO BE OVERCAPACITY BY BETWEEN 15 AND 18 CLASSROOMS. SO, WHAT'S A CLOSER SCHOOL WITH CAPACITY? IT'S ELEVATED. WE THINK ABOUT RE-BOUNDARY THE ABILITY TO WALK TO SCHOOL. PEOPLE LIVING IN DOWNTOWN BEING LOST OUT TO RURAL AREAS. VISCERAL CONSIDERATIONS THAT AS WE WERE THINKING ABOUT THIS LIST OF CRITICAL CAPACITY NEEDS.E TALKED ABOUT AND REALLY EVALUATED IT. FOR US, WHEN WE THINK ABOUT THE DOWNTOWN CORE REDMOND. HE FELT COMPELLED THAT IT MADE SENSE FOR STUDENTS TO BE LOCATED CLOSE IN THAT REGION. RATHER THAN PRESSING STUDENTS OUTSIDE OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA TO A SCHOOL THAT IS SIGNIFICANTLY FURTHER AWAY. REALLY THAT'S OUTSIDE OF THEIR COMMUNITY. SO AS WE WENT THROUGH EACH OF THESE ITEMS THIS IS WHERE WE LANDED. BECAUSE THESE ARE TRULY SPACE NEEDS. AND WHEN WE LOOKED AT, SO FOR ME, THE LAKE WASHINGTON AREA HIGH SCHOOL NEED. MY FIRST QUESTION WAS WELL THOUGHT 18 IT WAS CAN HAVE CAPACITY. ONLY BOLDED AFTER DATED LOOKED AT THEIR DATA THERE SHEET REACH THEIR CAPACITY IN THE NEXT 5 TO 6 YEARS. THAT'S JUST THE ONGOING GROWTH OF THE COMMUNITY. SO, THAT SOME OF THE INFORMATION ABOUT HOW WE LANDED HERE. THE BOARD ASKED FOR A PRIORITIZED LIST OF CAPACITY NEEDS. NOT JUST WHAT YOU NEED. THAT'S WHY YOU SEE VERY SPECIFIC YEARS NEEDED AND THAT IN THE FALL OF 2026 WE ACTUALLY ARE SO SUBSTANTIALLY OVER OUR CAPACITY LAKE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO COMPROMISE A STANDARD OF SERVICE TO THE POINT TO BE ABLE TO ACTUALLY HAVE CLASSROOMS FOR KIDS. SO THAT IS REALLY WHEN WE SAY CRITICAL CAPACITY AND INCIDENT JUST WHAT WE COULD DO A COUPLE THINGS MAY BE PROVIDE STUDENTS. >> SOME OF THESE PROJECTS. [INDISCERNABLE]. AS YOU SEE THE AGING, REPLACING EVERY BUILDING SCHOOLS ARE ANONYMOUS CRITICAL LIST.HUS THE CHALLENGE THERE. DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? >> I DO. I'M STILL SCRATCHING MY HEAD FOR REDMOND ELEMENTARY CAPACITY. I HEARD I DON'T REMEMBER IF BARBARA JOHN SAID IT APPEARED THAT THAT WAS NOT A NEW SCHOOL. SO WHAT IS IT IF IT'S ON NEW SCHOOL? >> BARBARA SAID WERE NOT SURE EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. SO I WILL TRY TO PROVIDE SOME LEVEL OF INFORMATION WITHOUT KNOWING. WE HAVEN'T DONE A STUDY. FOR EXAMPLE. WE HAVE THE REDMOND CAMPUS THAT HAS SPACE FOR ANOTHER BUILDING ON IT. ONE OPTION WE COULD CONSIDER IS DO WE HAVE A KATU SCHOOL IN A 35 SCHOOL? IN DOING THAT WE COULD ACTUALLY, THERE'S BENEFITS OF DOING THAT BOTH NANA MILLIE AND IT USES THIS S SPACE WE COULD DO SOME ASSURANCE BASIS. WE ALSO HAVE REDMOND OOLHOUSE IS THERE ANY WAY TO LEVERAGE SOME OF THAT SPACE POTENTIALLY AT THE GYM. SO THAT'S ONE POSSIBILITY. WE JUST PURCHASED LAND. NOW, THAT LAND IS ALSO NOT IN PROXIMITY TO THE STUDENTS THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. BUT, IT ALSO IS AN OPTION FOR US TO CONSIDER AS WELL. THERE'S A FEW DIFFERENT WAYS WE COULD CONSIDER THIS. BUT WE KNOW REDMOND HAS A PENDING NEED IN THE NEXT 2 TO 4 YEARS AND IT'S A REAL NEED. >> ALBANEY CLASSROOMS ROUGHLY WOULD WE BE LOOKING OUT FOR THIS PROJECT? >> BRIAN OR BARBARA WILL CORRECT ME. THE 53.5 NUMBER WAS A 24 [01:00:01] GENERAL ED CLASSROOMS. THAT ASSUMES CLASSROOMS ARE SET ASIDE FOR ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS, AND SPECIAL EDUCATION WHICH IS OUR SAFETY NET. >> AGAIN IT DEPENDS ON, WITHOUT COVID COMING ME BACK. THERE SHORT RIGHT NOW 16 CLASSROOMS, NOT TODAY. WITH PROJECTIONS. MOST CONSERVATIVE PROJECTIONS ARE SHORT 16 CLASSROOMS.WITH THE ANALYTICS IT GOES UP TO 24. THE COST REPRESENT 24 CLASSROOM. >> THANK YOU. >> COULD YOU WHEN WE DO PROJECTIONS AND THEN TO ENLARGE REBUILD A CAMPUS HOW MANY YEARS BACK WE LOOK AT THAT HAMLET YEARS FORWARD IN HOW WE DETERMINE THE CAPACITY THAT SCHOOL WILL NEED? >> SO WHEN WE ARE PLANNING A SCHOOL YOU HAVE TO PLAN A SCHOOL 3 TO 4 YEARS. THAT'S JUST, IT TAKES 2 YEARS ONCE IT'S FUNDED TO DESIGN AND BUILD AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL TAKES LONGER. FOR FUNDING MEN MEASURING OR PLANNING EARLIER THAN THAT. WE ARE USING OUR PROJECTIONS TO MAKE OUR BEST ESTIMATE OF WHERE THE CAPACITY NEEDS ARE. BY THE TIME THERE'S A FUNDING MEASURE AND CONSTRUCTION HAPPENS THAT'S WHY WE ALSO DO REBOUND TREATMENT WILL BE NEW SCHOOLS. [INDISCERNABLE]. ALSO PLAN FOR ADDITIONS AND PORTABLES IN ORDER TO DO THE ENROLLMENT CHANGES UP OR DOWN. THEN THE PORTABLE IS AN OPTION AS WELL. >>. [INDISCERNABLE]. ONLY WERE GIANT SIGN OUR NEW BUILDINGS ALL OF OUR 2016 PROJECTS BAKER AND BARTON WERE PLANNED FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS. SHOULD THE NEED ARISE WE COULD PUT ADDITIONS ON THOSE SCHOOLS OR PORTABLES IN THOSE SPACES AS WELL. >> RIGHT, I WANT TO JOHN'S POINT ABOUT RUNNING TO HIGH SCHOOL AND 5 OR SO YEARS IT'S GOING TO BE A CAPACITY AND HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO LOOK BACK, LOOK FORWARD AND PROJECT ENROLLMENTS AND THINGS HAVE CHANGED DRASTICALLY IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS HERE EVEN. BUT IT'S MORE COMPLICATED THAN LOOKING AT BIRTH RATES. >> RIGHT. OKAY. >> AS LONG AS WE LOOK AT THE CAPACITY PIECES ANOINT THE BUDGET DRIVES. [INDISCERNABLE]. THERE ARE 3 POTENTIAL CHOICE SCHOOLS OR 2 I SHOULD SAY. KNOWING WHAT OUR CAPACITY IS IT IS LIKE. [INDISCERNABLE]. QUICK SO WE BRIEFLY TALKED ABOUT IT. IT'S ALSO ABOUT WHICH HIGH SCHOOLS ARE OVERCAPACITY IN THE SHORT TERM WHERE THOSE STUDENTS LOCATED. KNOWING THAT LAKE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL WILL BE OVERCAPACITY IN THE COMING YEARS WITH 250 STUDENTS AND THEY HAVE EASTLAKE. THE CHOICE OF STRATEGY ALLOWS FOR STUDENTS TO COME FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. THERE'S ANOTHER WAY TO STRATIFY AND PULL STUDENTS, MORE STUDENTS FROM A SINGLE LOCATION IF WE NEEDED TO DO THAT. YES, WE DID TALK ABOUT THAT. WE ALSO HAVE PROPERTY WOULD JUST PURCHASED WHICH IS RIGHT BETWEEN EASTLAKE AND REDMOND HIGH SCHOOLS. GUESS WE TALKED ABOUT THAT. >> AGAIN THINKING LONG-TERM. [INDISCERNABLE]. [01:05:29] WORKS I THINK ADMINISTRATIVELY THAT'S PROBLEMATIC TO SUPPORT THAT PIECE. >> IS A CONSIDERATION IS OPERATING COST. IT'S A BIT COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL. OVER 2 MILLION WE WOULD NEED TO FIND OUT OF OUR GENERAL FUND FOR ONGOING OPERATING COST BECAUSE IF YOU DO A FORMAL ATHLETIC PROGRAM AND SO THERE'S A CONSIDERATION AS YOU LOOK AT THAT TOO. THAT WASN'T WHY WE SAID NOT A PROGRESS HIGH SCHOOL. >> SO WISE CHOICE OF 600 NOT A THOUSAND? THERE ARE PLACES WE COULD SHIFT THOSE. WHEN WE WERE TALKING YEARS AGO. BIGGER AND BIGGER AS ATTACHMENT TO THE STUDENTS I GET A LITTLE HESITANT WHEN I START TO SEE THAT. >> DIRECTOR CANNOT HAS A QUESTION PICKED. >> THANK YOU. JANET LIKE TO GO BACK A SECOND PART WHEN HE TALKED ABOUT THE SIZE EASTLAKE, HIS MIDDLE SCHOOL UP ON THE PLATEAU, ENGLAND. YOU SAY WHERE CAPACITY. MY CONCERN IS IF WE KEEP VOTING ON, WHEN DOES IT BECOME A DETRIMENT TO THE ADMINISTRATION ABILITIES OF THE BUILDING OR THE TEACHING ABILITIES OF THAT BUILDING WHEN HE GETS A MASSIVE. IS THERE CRITICAL MASS POINT, THAT'S WHAT I'M GETTING OUT. >> THAT IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING WE CAN CONSIDER. WHICH IS WHY WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EASTLAKE AND TRYING TO PROVIDE CAPACITY OUTSIDE OF EASTLAKE HIGH SCHOOL. WE HAVE ADDED ON AT EASTLAKE WITH REMODELING INTERIOR SPACES AND THOUGH GOVERNMENT IS APPROACHING 2200 WHICH IS BIGGER THAN OUR DESIRES. SO YOU'RE CERTAINLY CORRECT AND THERE BECOMES A POINT WHERE IT BECOMES CHALLENGING WHICH ARE ALSO STRESSING THE SPACE AND THAT'S WHAT WERE DOING WITH OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WERE MAKING SURE WERE ADDING TO CORE SPACE. SO THAT'S THE CHALLENGE AS YOU PUT ADDITIONS ON SCHOOLS. >> I CAN UNDERSTAND OR TALK ABOUT REDMOND AL AND NEEDING TO ADD 24 CLASSROOMS TO IT. AND AT THAT POINT I GUESS REDMOND IS ONE-STORY ANYWAY. OR I MIGHT BE REMEMBERING WRONG. HOW MUCH DOES THAT, DOES A DOUBLE SIZE THE SCHOOL? DOES IT ADD 33 PERCENT MORE TY? WHAT IS IT ADD? >> WE HAVEN'T FINALIZED THE DECISION WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE. IT'S NOT NECESSARILY IN ADDITION TO THE CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LIKE WE TALKED ABOUT. THERE IS PROPERTY ON THE REDMOND CAMPUS ORANGE CAMPUS SO THERE'S EXTRA PROPERTY WE CAN BUILD ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT. I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT AGAIN, ADMINISTRATIVELY IF YOU ADD ON TO IT HOW MUCH OF A SQUEEZE TO END UP PUTTING ON THE PRINCIPALS AND VICE PRINCIPALS DO HAVE TO ADD MORE STUFF I JUST NEED TO STOP AN ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF. AT ONE POINT TO SAY, G8 WE'VE GOT TO SCHOOLS ON CAMPUSES OPPOSED TO ONE. >> WE WILL LOOK AT THAT AS WE HAD CLASSROOMS AND ADDING 24 SPACES WE WOULD ASSUME THAT IS THE SIZE OF A SMALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.> RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. >> OKAY, SO CONTINUING TO MOVE ALONG THE PATHWAY AND THIS IS A FORK IN THE ROAD FOR US AS WE THINK ABOUT DECISIONS AND [01:10:03] CHOICES BECAUSE THESE ARE DIFFICULT DECISIONS THAT WE ARE GOING TO PACKAGE AS A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD ULTIMATELY DECIDES ON FUNDING MEASURES THAT END UP ON A BALLOT. AGAIN, WE WANT TO CONTINUE TO GO BACK TO OUR OPTIONS. HOPEFULLY PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR YOU SO THAT THESE ARE MAKING SENSE TO YOU. THAT'S WHY WE CONTINUE TO COME BACK TO THE OPTIONS. AND SO CHRISTIE DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION BEFORE JUMPING TO THESE? >> YEAH. SO THE QUESTION OF GOD. THIS IS SOMETHING. [INDISCERNABLE] AS WE GO THROUGH THIS OVER TALK ABOUT ATTACKS RIGHT PER THOUSAND. IS THAT PREDICATED ON TOTAL DOLLARS THAT ARE APPROVED TO COLLECT OR IS THAT PREDICATED ON THE PERCENT TO APPROVED TO COLLECT? REASON I ASK IN THE CITY OF KIRKLAND THE LAST 4 YEARS THE MEETING ASSESSED VALUE WENT UP 40 PERCENT. WHICH MEANS THAT'S DOLLARS PER THOUSAND, OUR TAX BILL HAS GONE UP DRAMATICALLY. IT'S A TOTAL AMOUNT THAT ARE TAX BREAK HAS GONE DOWN. JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY WHICH OF THOSE IS THIS SITUATION. >> OURS IS ABOUT THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT'S WHAT WAS ON THE BALLOT. BASED ON ASSESSED VALUATION DETERMINES OF RATE. TYPICALLY WHEN AB GROWS HIGHER THAN THE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE AND WERE PRETTY CONSERVATIVE FOR ESTIMATES FOR AB THEN THE TAX RATE DROPS. IF YOU LOOKED AT HER TAX RATE FLASHBACK IN 2014 WE WERE IN AT 315 OR $3.30. OUR TAX RATE IS NOW $2.57. AS MORE HOMES ARE BUILT, MORE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. >> IT'S NOT THAT MOM WHAT ABOUT ITS HOMES ARE GOING UP 15 PERCENT A YEAR. [INDISCERNABLE]. THE TAX AMOUNT IS FLAT. [INDISCERNABLE]. >> THE IMPORTANT PART IS THE AVERAGE TAXPAYER SEES A STUDY ABOUT ON A STEADY RATE AS OUR HOUSES FLUCTUATE. >> THE DOLLARS CITED, EACH YEAR THE DOLLARS INCREASE BY PATIENT BUT NOT BECAUSE OF THE GROWTH. >> THANK YOU FOR CALLING THAT OUT CHRIS. IT'S AN IMPORTANT ASPECT OF SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDING MEASURES. SO OPTION A AGAIN PRIORITIZES THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS LEVY. YOU CAN SEE ON THE FAR RIGHT COLUMN YOU CAN SEE THE TAX RATE ESTIMATE. SO YOU WILL SEE THAT CHANGE WITH EACH OF THE OPTIONS. AS WE GOES THROUGH THEM. YOU CAN SEE IT OUT AS A DOLLARS-PER THOUSAND. CAPITAL PROJECTS UC IS $0.52 ON EACH, ON ALL OF THE SLIDES. ALL THE OPTIONS. COUPLE CONSTRUCTION YOU CAN SEE HERE IS $0.13 PER THOUSAND OF ASSESSED VALUE. REMEMBER OUR OPTION C PRIORITIZES CONSTRUCTION. HE WILL SEE THAT SERVE TO INCREASE IN E PIANO AND DECREASE AS WE GO THROUGH THE OPTIONS A, B AND YOU CAN SEE THE 2019 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION COST IS STILL IN THERE. THEN HER PRIOR BONDS ARE ALSO STILL IN THERE FOR TOTAL TAX RATE OF $2.57. IN OPTION B THIS IS THE OPTION THAT BALANCES. THE EP AT ALL AND CONSTRUCTION. YOU CAN SEE IN THE TAX RATE COLUMN FOR EP AND OUT IT WENT DOWN FROM THE DOLLAR- $2.97. YOU CAN SEE THE 22 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION WENT UP FROM AN AVERAGE OF $0.13 PER THOUSAND OF ASSESSED VALUE TO $0.25. THEN HE ALSO LOOK AT THE 4-YEAR TOTAL IF YOU GO BACK TO OPTION A. IT'S ABOUT 378 [01:15:03] MILLION TOTAL FOR 4 YEARS OF E PIANO APPEARED AND $47 MILLION FOR CONSTRUCTION. WHERE IN OPTION B IT'S 3:30 ILLION OVER THE 4 YEARS FOR E AND THAT CONSTRUCTION INCREASES TO 85 MILLION. YOU CAN SEE WITH THIS IS OPTION FOR 2 ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS. WE CAN ACTUALLY CONDUCT SOME CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS USING THESE FUNDS. THEN GOING TO OPTION C. AND PRIORITIZES LIMITED CONSTRUCTION. SO YOU CAN SEE OUR E PIANO WENT FROM IF I'M REMEMBERING CORRECTLY 3 DOLLARS AND 76 DOWN TO $3.06. WITH A TAX RATE OF $0.90 PER THOUSAND. WITH THE CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION INCREASING FROM $0.13 PER HUNDRED THOUSAND IN OPTION 8 UP TO 0.32. ALL MAINTAINING THE TAX RATE AT .57. THERE REALLY IS JUST SHIFTING THE TAX RATE BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT LEVIES WITHIN OPTIONS A, B AND C NOT TOUCHING THE TAX RATE. FOR ME WHEN I THINK ABOUT KEEPING THE BOARD FULLY INFORMED PROVIDING YOU WITH CONSIDERATIONS.HAT'S WHAT OPTION D COMES FROM. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO BRING YOU A RECOMMENDATION THAT I KNOW ACTUALLY DOESN'T PROVIDE THE CAPACITY NEEDS FOR STUDENTS. IN OPTION C, STILL DOESN'T REACH THAT THRESHOLD BY PROVIDING CAPACITY FOR STUDENTS. IT'S ABOUT A LITTLE LESS THAN HALF A DOLLARS NEEDED TO ACTUALLY PROVIDE SHORT-TERM CAPACITY NEEDS FOR STUDENTS. YOU CAN SEE HERE OPTION D, THE TAX RATE FOR E PIANO IS DON 9. YOU CAN THE 2022 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION TAX RATE IS $0.32. IT T TAKES THE TAX RATE FROM E PIANO FOR OPTION N A IN THE TAX RATE FOR CAPITAL TRUCTION FROM OPTION N C AND COMBINES IT INTO OPTION D. PROVIDING FOR EDUCATIONAL RAMS AT A IMILAR RATE AS WE ARE NOW. KNOWING THAT WE HAVE THAT NEGATIVE FISCAL GAP. IT ALSO PROVIDES THE DOLLARS IN THE SHORT TERM TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE TRUE CAPACITY NEEDS OF STUDENTS IN OUR DISTRICT. IT INCREASES THE TOTAL TAX RATE FROM 257 2 276. SO AN INCREASE OF $0.19 PER THOUSAND OF ASSESSED VALUE. YOU CAN SEE ON THE SHEET IN FRONT OF YOU. THE VERY BOTTOM RAIL IT'S INGRATIATED. WHAT THAT HOWS IS A CHANGE FOR HOMES. FOR THE FIRST 3 OPTIONS AB AND C WE ARE E ARE PROPOSING WE ARE G A NOTE TAX RATE TE INCREASE BUT NO TAX INCREASE WITH OPTION OF THE THINGS I THOUGHT. YOU COULD SEE OPTION D DOES S INCREASE AN CREASE THE E TAX FOR THE HOMEOWNER OWNING A HOME VALUED AT $800,000 AT ABOUT $152 PER YEAR. AND SO THAT IS OPTION D. >> WILL YOU REMIND US DOCTOR HOMAN WHAT THAT MAXIMUM AMOUNT A DISTRICT CAN GO OUT FOR OLIVIA'S?>> SO FOR FOR CAPITAL JECTS CONSTRUCTION OR BOND WELL, FOR THE CAPITAL LEVIES THERE IS NO MAXIMUM. FOR BOND THERE IS A THRESHOLD OF THE AMOUNT OF DEBT YOU COULD TAKE ON. I BELIEVE THAT'S A 5 PERCENT. >> THERE'S THAT FORMULA. >> THEM OR NOT CLOSE. >> THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO KNOW. >> SCHOOL DISTRICTS BASED ON CAN EITHER CLICK $2500 PER STUDENT. >> THERE'S A LIMIT ON LEVIES IT'S ABOUT $2500. RECOLLECTING ABOUT 2100 DOLLARS. ON E &O. THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL 40 THAT CAN BE COLLECTED. [01:20:03] >> SO OPTION A AND OPTION D GETS US CLOSER TO THAT $2600 WITH INFLATION NUMBER. TO PROVIDE SOME INFORMATION ASSUMING THIS GETS TO SOME OF WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR. AS WE THINK ABOUT OUR CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUNDING. IF WE WERE TO EXTEND OUT AN ONGOING OUT OF THE STRATEGY. THESE WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE TAX RATE IF WE WERE TO IF BONDS ARE PAID OFF JUST FILL THE GAP WITH CONSTRUCTION LEVY FUNDING. YOU CAN SEE THAT THE CUMULATIVE TOTAL UNDER OPTION A BY 2030 GIVES US JUST AROUND 250 MILLION. THAT BALANCED APPROACH OF HER CONTINUING THAT STRATEGY BY 2030 WILL HAVE ABOUT 33 MILLION. LOOKING AT OPTION C YOU CAN SEE BY 2030 IS 300 JUST ABOUT $90 0 MILLION. BARBARA I WILL ASK YOU TO PLAIN OPTION D AND HOW IT ENDS UP AT 390 BILLION. >> SO OPTION D IS A 6 YEAR. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN C AND D IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING? SO WE SET UP AS A 6 OR LEVY. THAT'S WITHOUT MIND IS AFTER 2028. SO THE TOTAL FOR A 6 YEAR LEVY AS 231 MILLION. IF IT WAS A 4 YEAR LEVY IT WOULD STILL BE AROUND $111 MILLION. OVER 6 YEARS WE CAN COLLECT 231. I WANT TO POINT OUT YOU CAN SEE THIS ON ALL 4 OPTIONS. JOHNNY DON'T NEED TO LOOK BACK. IF YOU LOOK ON OPTION C. IN 2026 YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A CHILD BETWEEN THE AMOUNT THEY CAN COLLECT BETWEEN 23,000,046. THAT'S BECAUSE WE HAVE OUR BONDS ARE STRUCTURED TO BE REDUCED ABOUT EVERY 4 YEARS. WE HAVE A REDUCTION. BONDS ARE BEING PAID OFF SO IN 2026 THERE WAS CAPACITY FOR NEW DEBT SO TO SPEAK. NEW CONSTRUCTION DEBT. BETWEEN 29 AND 2030 SAME THING. THERE'S A JUMP OF 64 MILLION TO 94 MILLION AND IS BONDS ARE BEING PAID OFF SO THERE'S CAPACITY WITH THE LEVEL TAX RATE TO COLLECT MORE DOLLARS. BECAUSE THESE OTHER BONDS ARE BEING PAID OFF. TOTAL BETWEEN BONDS AND LEVIES ARE THE SAME. AS LEVIES GO UP BONDS ARE GOING DOWN. >> IT'S OPTION D. ESSENTIALLY FOR THE EPO FOR THE CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION. IN ESSENCE. >> OKAY I'M STILL TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE SOUL DOLLARS. THE RATE. [INDISCERNABLE]. THE RATE IS GOING DOWN. NOT BECAUSE NECESSARILY THE DOLLARS ARE BEING CHANGED BUT, THE ASSESSED VALUE IS GOING UP, UP COME UP. THIS IS SOMETHING WE THINK I WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE TO SEE A REPRESENTATION OF THE TOTAL TAX DOLLARS COLLECTED BY THE DISTRICT. PER YEAR. BECAUSE, ASSUME WE HAVE NO MORE TAXPAYERS PER YEAR. YOUR COLLECTING MORE TAX DOLLARS AND EVERYONE STOP PAIN OR TAXES. THE TAX RATE IS GOING TO CHANGE WILDLY DEPENDING ON WHETHER IT'S 2008 AND MY HOUSE PRICES CRASHED TOWARDS 2020 IN MY HOUSE PRICES WENT UP 30 PERCENT LAST YEAR. THESE THINGS, THE TAX RATE WINDS UP BEING HALFWAY ACROSS à ¦ SO ONE SET BEING SOMEWHERE, I COULD SEE THE TOTAL DOLLARS BEING ELECTED TOOK A DIP 4 YEARS AGO. AND IS NEVER RECOVERED. THEN I MIGHT BE ABLE TO ADJUST THE FIGHT OPTION D. THE SENSE OF GETTING THAT TO THE TOTAL DOLLARS PER COLLECTING FOR TAXES AS A TAX ENTITY RATHER [01:25:10] THAN THE RATE PER YEAR SAMPLE SEE TOTAL DOLLARS THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT NEEDS TO PROVIDE EDUCATION. I CAN'T SAY SO I SEE IT WITH THAT TOTAL TAX DOLLARS COLLECTED. RATHER THAN TAX RATE. >> THE COMMENT ON THAT CHRIS TO ME THERE'S A FEW DIFFERENT ¦ >> WORK TOWARDS, ONE IS OF THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS THAT WE ARE MAKING CAN WE PREDICTABLY SAY THAT WERE AT LEAST GOING TO MAINTAIN THE TAX RATE KNOWING THAT THE ASSUMPTIONS ARE CONSERVATIVE IN THIS ENVIRONMENT GENERALLY GOING TO EITHER STAY THE SAME OR DECLINE OVER TIME. I WOULD SAY OUR UNDERLINING ASSUMPTIONS ARE CONSERVATIVE. OUR CURRENT ASSUMPTION IS AROUND 5 PERCENT. KNOWING WHAT'S OCCURRED IN THE COMMUNITY. >> THE AVERAGE ÃIN THE 5 YEARS HAS BEEN 10 PERCENT. ON AVERAGE, 10 PERCENT PER YEAR. [INDISCERNABLE]. >> THERE ARE 2 OTHER PIECES THAT I THINK ABOUT HOW DO WE, IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT TRANSPARENCY. IT'S ALSO ABOUT TRANSPARENCY. IT'S ALSO ABOUT MAKING THAT TOTAL TAX BURDEN BY ANY INDIVIDUAL. SEE THAT ON THE SHEETS. SOMETHING NEVER TALKED ABOUT THAT MUCH IN THE LAST CAMPAIGNS I'VE BEEN A PART OF. THEN ALSO TO YOUR POINT CHRIS IS, WHAT IS BEEN THE OVERALL TAX REVENUE COLLECTED FROM THESE? I THINK I WOULD ADD ONE PIECE WE EVEN ASKED OUR COMMUNITY ALSO FOR BOND DOLLARS THAT HAVE BEEN PASSED. THAT I WOULD ARGUE WERE NEEDED ASKS NOT JUST ONCE TO THE COMMUNITY. >> WANT NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT NOT NEEDED. I'M JUST TERMS OF HOW THE TAXPAYER INTERPRETS IT NUMBERS. I'M LOOKING AT MY TAX ASSESSED VALUE AND 2017 IS 516,000. LAST YEAR IT WAS 730,000 MEDIAN. THAT'S GONE UP BY 50 PERCENT IN 5 YEARS. 10 PERCENT JUMPS EVERY YEAR. MY TAXES SHOULDN'T HAVE GONE UP. MY TAXES. SO WHEN THE PROJECT OUT FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS CAN BE THE SAME RATE PER THOUSAND ASSESSED VALUE. OR MAKE AN ASSUMPTION. HOUSE PRICES WILL CHANGE. BUT INEXPERIENCE IS OUR HOUSE PRICES HAVE CHANGED. WERE KIND OF FREAKING OUT. I THINK THAT'S WHY I'M LOOKING AT THIS AS WERE TALKING ABOUT THE WRONG NUMBER. TAXES DON'T GO UP. THE TOTAL DOLLARS ARE SPENT ON TAXES DON'T GO UP I KNOW WE HAVE A BALD. [INDISCERNABLE]. IT'S BASED ON THE TOTAL DOLLARS COLLECTED BY A SCHOOL DISTRICT WENT ON TO EQUAL AMOUNT AND IT NEVER RECOVERED. AND ACTUALLY NEVER GOT BACK TO THE SAME LEVEL OF TAXES THAT ARE BEING PAID BY THE AVERAGE TAXPAYER. THAT TO ME IS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT TO ME. IT'S ABSOLUTELY MISSED WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT THE CONFERENCE OF RATE PER THOUSAND ASSESSED VALUE. BECAUSE, THOSE OF US HAVE LEARNED THE LAST 20 YEARS. ASSUME THAT OURS IS GOING TO BE ASSESSED MORE LAST THIS YEAR THAT WAS LESTER. >> DIRECTOR TRENTON WAS WAITING PATIENTLY. ALL BREED HIS QUESTION. DIRECTOR AGREES WITH CHRIS'S APPOINTMENT ASKS FOR A ILLUSTRATION OF WHAT THE TAX IMPACT HAS BEEN AND WOULD BE ON A TYPICAL HOUSE BY WAY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION. >> AND SO ON THE BOTTOM, I THINK THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE ASKING. WHAT IS A TOTAL DOLLARS THAT INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER WOULD PAY. SO FOR SOMEONE WHO OWNS AN $800,000 IN OPTIONS A THROUGH C. THE DOLLARS IS 2056. AN OPTION D IS 2208. >> OKAY. [01:30:03] >> SO REALLY IT'S A POINT OF WHEN YOU PUT A LEVY ON THE BALLOT OR BOND. YOU'RE ASKING FOR CERTAIN DOLLAR AMOUNT AND WE ARE NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO COLLECT MORE THAN THAT CERTAIN DOLLAR AMOUNTS. SO EVEN IF YOUR HOUSE VALUE GOES UP WE STILL CANNOT COLLECT MORE THAN THAT AMOUNT. >> THAT WAS MY POINT. IF MY HOUSE IS WORTH A MILLION DOLLARS I AM STILL ONLY PAYING 2000 8 DOLLARS. THAT'S A REALLY IMPORTANT DECISION. >> WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO ILLUSTRATE THAT SO EVERY FOOTER CAN UNDERSTAND THAT. ALL THE LETTERS THAT MEAN SOMETHING TO US LEAD TO THE AVERAGE TAXPAYER PUBLIC DOES IT TRANSLATE. IF WE CAN GET IT AS JOHN JUST SAID IF YOUR HOUSE IS WORTH TAX THIS IS YOUR TAX RATE YOU PAID LAST 3. WHY THEN YOU COULD SAY OJ IT WENT UP X DOLLARS. NEEDS TO BE VERY, VERY SIMPLE TO THEM AND IF WE HAVE TO PUT IT IN TERMS OF PERHAPS NOT VALUE BUT PERHAPS A NUMBER OF BEDROOMS, I DON'T KNOW. WHATEVER WOULD WORK THAT PEOPLE COULD VISUALIZE IT. IF THEY CAN'T SEE IT THEY CAN'T THINK IT. >> I CAN THINK BACK IN 2016 AND THE EDUCATION PAPERWORK THAT SPOKE TO TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE IN A COMMUNITY IS HOW THEY DETERMINE LIKE $50 MILLION OF THE TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE WOULD'VE BEEN TAX ASSESSMENT TAX RATE. AS IT GOES UP RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL. [INDISCERNABLE]. IT ALLOWS US TO SEE THE LEVY AS AN OPTION. WITHOUT TAX BURDEN ON OUR COMMUNITY ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE, REMEMBER THE CHARTS IN THE CARTOONS. I REMEMBER HOUSES POPPING UP AND GOING TOWN AND WITH THE RIGHT WAS. ANOTHER ZAVALA GOOD INFORMATION OUT THERE WE HAD TO USE PRIOR. [INDISCERNABLE]. >> WE HAVE 2 VIDEOS WE SHARED WITH HER ON AN LEVY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THOSE WERE VIDEOS WE HAD OUT DRAIN ALL OF OUR LEVY AND BOND INFORMATIONAL CAMPAIGNS. SO THOSE VIDEOS ARE OUT AND AVAILABLE TO EXPLAIN THIS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. WE CONTINUE TO MAKE THOSE AVAILABLE. >> RUNNING SHORT ON TIME. SO, I DON'T KNOW. >> A FEW MORE SLIDES AND THEN WE CAPACITOR THE BOARD. WHEN WE THINK ABOUT THE MODELS WE TALKED WITH HER BOND AND LEVY A FORESTRY COMMITTEE AS WELL. DEPENDING ON THE STRATEGY YOU HAVE 2 BALLOT MEASURES. IF WE THINK ABOUT COMBINING OR HAVING IN A P&L ON EITHER AN IN MODEL L ONE IT'LL BE A PORT FOR YOUR CAPITAL L PROJECT TO LUDE CONSTRUCTION AND IT WOULD BE TO BALLOT MEASURES WHERE THE MODEL T WAS REALLY LOOKING AT YOUR E P&L, OR STANDARD CAPITAL PROJECTS RENEWAL LEVY FOR FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY AND IN ADDITION TO II BALLOT MEASURE OF THE 6-YEAR CAPITAL PROJECTS, CONSTRUCTION LEVY. FIGURES FEEDBACK AROUND NOT IF WE HAD ONE MORE PERSON IN THE ROOM WE COULD'VE GOTTEN 50 PERCENT. >> THAT SEEMS RIGHT THOUGH. >> THE PROS AND CONS ARE 2 EACH. IT'S A BEFORE THE BOARD TO CONSIDER IS YOUR THINKING ABOUT GIVING US FEEDBACK AS WELL. SO NEXT STEPS FOR US WE ARE ENGAGING WITH AN EXTERNAL PARTY TO CONDUCT A STATISTICALLY RELIABLE AND VALID COMMUNITY SURVEY. REGARDING A NUMBER OF THESE PIECES COULD AUGUST 7 WE WILL COME BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A STUDY SESSION. AND POTENTIALLY HOLD 3RD ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING IN LATE AUGUST OR EARLY SEPTEMBER. AS YOU KNOW THIS GOES PRETTY QUICKLY. FILING DATE IS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 10. DECEMBER 10 IS VERY LATE TO MOVE THIS FORWARD KNOWING THAT WE HAVE THIS INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET THAT WE WANT OUR COMMUNITY æ FOR THE TOTAL [01:35:05] PROGRAM WE'RE THINKING ABOUT AND PUTTING ON THE BALLOT IN FEBRUARY. AND SO THAT'S WHY THE URGENCY TO GET INFORMATION TO THE BOARD OF WHAT WERE THINKING ABOUT PER YOUR FEEDBACK TONIGHT BUT, ALSO YOU DO HAVE I BELIEVE IT'S A GREEN SHEET IN FRONT OF YOU. SO IT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU COULD COMPLETE THAT AND I WOULD SAY IT'S 6:56. IF YOU COULD COMPLETE THAT THIS WEEK AND SNAP A PICTURE OF IT AND EMAIL IT TO ME. THEN WE COULD TAKE THAT AND IF YOU HAVE OTHER COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS AND WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW IS AN OVERALL LEVY PROGRAM. MEANING A P&L, CAPITAL PROJECTS AND CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION. TION. AND HOW DO WE MESSAGE AND THAT IS KEY THAT WILL BE A CRITICAL PART OF THIS. RIGHT NOW WE ARE NARROWING IT ON FEEDBACK SO WE CAN TAKE THAT BACK CONSIDER IT A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION AS EARLY AS AUGUST 7 OR AS LATE AS SEPTEMBER. WITHOUT THAT'S ALL WE HAVE FOR YOU THIS EVENING. >> GREAT. CAN WE EMAIL THE PAPER TO MARK. OH, AND TO ME AND TO EVERYONE ELSE. OR WAIT, WHAT'S HER HESITANCY FOR EMAILING IT? ANY? >> MOLLY HESITANCY WAS MY MIKE WASN'T WORKING. I WILL EMAIL THIS TO THE BOARD SO YOU CAN COMPLETE IT. BECAUSE IT'S A WORD BACK AND EMAIL IT BACK IN. WE DROP THIS RACKET OFF TO MARK EARLIER AS WELL. SO HE HAS ALL OF THIS AS WELL. > AND YOUR FINE WITH THE CELL PHONE PICTURE TO? >> THAT'S FINE. >> THAT'S HOW I COMMUNICATE THROUGH MY MOUTH. OKAY. OKAY EAT. YES WE HAVE A BUSINESS MEETING STARTING IN 2 MINUTES. WE WILL START AT 7:05. IS THAT OKAY? OKAY. 7:FIVE. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.